<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:bs="http://blogsoft.org/bs/elements/1.0/">
	<channel>
		<title>PalinPower</title>
		<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/</link>
		<description>En uoffisiell støtteblogg til Sarah Palin. Drives av VamPus.</description>
		<link rel="hub" href="http://bloggno.superfeedr.com/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<link rel="self" href="http://feeds.blogg.no/277050/post.rss" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<language>no</language>
		<generator></generator>
		<bs:blogid>277050</bs:blogid>
		<bs:blogurl>http://palinpower.blogg.no/</bs:blogurl>
		<bs:blogname>PalinPower</bs:blogname>
		<bs:image-profile>http://static.blogsoft.no/img/profiles/265831_1220891616897.png</bs:image-profile>
		<bs:url-profile>http://blogsoft.no/index.bd?fa=pf.view&amp;pf_id=165602</bs:url-profile>
					
				
		
		<item>
			<title>Trodde Afrika var et land</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:16:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1225977088_trodde_afrika_var_et_.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1225977088_trodde_afrika_var_et_.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ifølge Dagbladet  trodde Sarah Palin at Afrika var et land. Kanskje ikke så rart i all den tid vestlige medier stort sett refererer til kontinentet som om det faktisk var det.  Man kan sikkert ha det mye moro med Palins manglende urix-kunnskaper. Personlig gleder jeg meg til Joe Bidens &quot;foot-in-the-mouth&quot;- uttalelser, så jeg tror ikke vi har gått glipp av så mye moro i årene fremover.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dagbladet.no/art/sarah_palin/usa-valget_2008/3646196/">Ifølge Dagbladet</a> trodde Sarah Palin at Afrika var et land. Kanskje ikke så rart i all den tid vestlige medier stort sett refererer til kontinentet som om det faktisk var det.<br /><br />Man kan sikkert ha det mye moro med Palins manglende urix-kunnskaper. Personlig gleder jeg meg til Joe Bidens &quot;foot-in-the-mouth&quot;- uttalelser, så jeg tror ikke vi har gått glipp av så mye moro i årene fremover.]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>3</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Gov. Palin and Katie Couric get real and adorable</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1222695512_gov_palin_and_katie_c.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1222695512_gov_palin_and_katie_c.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Tina Fey er fortsatt dronningen -  gå hit .          ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tina Fey er fortsatt dronningen - <a href="http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/couric-palin-open/704042/">gå hit</a>.<object width="384" height="283"><param name="movie" value="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/48e0db366094f18b/4741e3c5156499a7/16f35f23/logoLink/http%3a%2f%2fwww.nbc.com%3fvty+%3d+fromWidget_Video/clipID/704042/siteDomain/nbc/graboffUrl/http%3a%2f%2fvideo.nbcuni.com%2fwidgetxml%2fsingleClip1%2fnbcshare.png/siteShow/nbc.com/moreLikeLink/http%3a%2f%2fwww.nbc.com%2fSaturday_Night_Live%2fvideo%2fclips%2fcouric-palin-open%2f704042%2f/textFieldColor/FFFFFF/videoPlayerSkin/http%3a%2f%2fvideo.nbcuni.com%2fwidgetxml%2fsingleClip1%2fskin14.swf/showID/61/bgndUrl/http%3a%2f%2fvideo.nbcuni.com%2fwidgetxml%2fsingleClip1%2fbg.swf/configID/1105/configxmlPath/http%3a%2f%2fvideo.nbcuni.com%2fwidgetxml%2fsingleClip1%2fsingleclip_omniConfig.xml/wName/NBC+Video/video_title/NBC+Video?storeInPid=true"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param></object>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>10</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Ord eller handling?</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221658089_ord_eller_handling.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221658089_ord_eller_handling.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ifølge VG  vender amerikanske kvinner ryggen til Sarah Palin. Vi vet jo fra før at kvinner på høyresida ikke teller som kvinner, for vi er jo som regel ikke organisert i en sosialistisk kvinnebevegelse som er for økt statlig kontroll. For min del vender jeg ryggen til kvinnebevegelser som vender ryggen til Sarah Palin, men så er jeg da heller ikke amerikansk.  Men kampen om de kvinnelige velgerne blir tøffere, og Obama-kampanjen angriper McCain for å være kvinnefiendtlig, blant annet fordi han ikke støtter et likelønnsforslag i senatet. Men  ifølge Boston Herald  tjener kvinnene i Obamas stab i senatet mindre enn  McCains.  Det Demokrater trenger en lov for å gjennomføre, gjør altså John McCain uten videre. En klassisk &quot;put you money where your mouth is&quot;.   Obamas stab:  &quot;Obama?s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama?s average male employee earned $54,397. Obama?s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.&quot;   McCains stab:  &quot;McCain?s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878. On average, according to these data, women in McCain?s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal,  a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart - while adding $10,726 to her annual income - by leaving Obama?s office and going to work for McCain.&quot;   Med andre ord:   &quot;In short, these statistics suggest that McCain is more than fair with his female employees, while Obama - at the expense of the women who work for him - quietly perpetuates the very same pay-equity divide that he loudly denounces.&quot;  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/presidentvalg-2008/artikkel.php?artid=526246">Ifølge VG</a> vender amerikanske kvinner ryggen til Sarah Palin. Vi vet jo fra før at kvinner på høyresida ikke teller som kvinner, for vi er jo som regel ikke organisert i en sosialistisk kvinnebevegelse som er for økt statlig kontroll. For min del vender jeg ryggen til kvinnebevegelser som vender ryggen til Sarah Palin, men så er jeg da heller ikke amerikansk.<br /><br />Men kampen om de kvinnelige velgerne blir tøffere, og Obama-kampanjen angriper McCain for å være kvinnefiendtlig, blant annet fordi han ikke støtter et likelønnsforslag i senatet. Men <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view.bg?articleid=1118682&amp;srvc=home&amp;position=rated">ifølge Boston Herald</a> tjener kvinnene i Obamas stab i senatet mindre enn  McCains.  Det Demokrater trenger en lov for å gjennomføre, gjør altså John McCain uten videre. En klassisk &quot;put you money where your mouth is&quot;.<br /><br /><strong>Obamas stab:</strong> &quot;Obama?s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama?s average male employee earned $54,397. Obama?s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.&quot;<br /><strong><br />McCains stab:</strong> &quot;McCain?s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878.<p>On average, according to these data, women in McCain?s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal, <strong>a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart - while adding $10,726 to her annual income - by leaving Obama?s office and going to work for McCain.&quot;</strong></p><p>Med andre ord:</p><p><strong>&quot;In short, these statistics suggest that McCain is more than fair with his female employees, while Obama - at the expense of the women who work for him - quietly perpetuates the very same pay-equity divide that he loudly denounces.&quot;</strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>4</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Ord eller handling?</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221657062_kvinner_mot_palin.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221657062_kvinner_mot_palin.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ifølge VG  vender amerikanske kvinner ryggen til Sarah Palin. Vi vet jo fra før at kvinner på høyresida ikke teller som kvinner, for vi er jo som regel ikke organisert i en sosialistisk kvinnebevegelse som er for økt statlig kontroll. For min del vender jeg ryggen til kvinnebevegelser som vender ryggen til Sarah Palin, men så er jeg da heller ikke amerikansk.  Men kampen om de kvinnelige velgerne blir tøffere, og Obama-kampanjen angriper McCain for å være kvinnefiendtlig, blant annet fordi han ikke støtter et likelønnsforslag i senatet. Men en  ifølge Boston Herald  tjener kvinnene i Obamas stab i senatet mindre enn  McCains.  Det Demokrater trenger en lov for å gjennomføre, gjør altså John McCain uten videre. En klassisk &quot;put you money where your mouth is&quot;.   Obamas stab:  &quot;Obama?s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama?s average male employee earned $54,397. Obama?s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.&quot;   McCains stab:  &quot;McCain?s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878. On average, according to these data, women in McCain?s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal,  a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart - while adding $10,726 to her annual income - by leaving Obama?s office and going to work for McCain.&quot;   Med andre ord:   &quot;In short, these statistics suggest that McCain is more than fair with his female employees, while Obama - at the expense of the women who work for him - quietly perpetuates the very same pay-equity divide that he loudly denounces.&quot;  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/presidentvalg-2008/artikkel.php?artid=526246">Ifølge VG</a> vender amerikanske kvinner ryggen til Sarah Palin. Vi vet jo fra før at kvinner på høyresida ikke teller som kvinner, for vi er jo som regel ikke organisert i en sosialistisk kvinnebevegelse som er for økt statlig kontroll. For min del vender jeg ryggen til kvinnebevegelser som vender ryggen til Sarah Palin, men så er jeg da heller ikke amerikansk.<br /><br />Men kampen om de kvinnelige velgerne blir tøffere, og Obama-kampanjen angriper McCain for å være kvinnefiendtlig, blant annet fordi han ikke støtter et likelønnsforslag i senatet. Men en <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view.bg?articleid=1118682&amp;srvc=home&amp;position=rated">ifølge Boston Herald</a> tjener kvinnene i Obamas stab i senatet mindre enn  McCains.  Det Demokrater trenger en lov for å gjennomføre, gjør altså John McCain uten videre. En klassisk &quot;put you money where your mouth is&quot;.<br /><br /><strong>Obamas stab:</strong> &quot;Obama?s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama?s average male employee earned $54,397. Obama?s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.&quot;<br /><strong><br />McCains stab:</strong> &quot;McCain?s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878.<p>On average, according to these data, women in McCain?s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal, <strong>a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart - while adding $10,726 to her annual income - by leaving Obama?s office and going to work for McCain.&quot;</strong></p><p>Med andre ord:</p><p><strong>&quot;In short, these statistics suggest that McCain is more than fair with his female employees, while Obama - at the expense of the women who work for him - quietly perpetuates the very same pay-equity divide that he loudly denounces.&quot;</strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>0</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Demokrat forsvarer Palin</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221482632_demokrat_forsvarer_pa.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221482632_demokrat_forsvarer_pa.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[        ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,29,0" width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qpBXYcgXV8M&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qpBXYcgXV8M&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" wmode="transparent" quality="high" menu="false" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>1</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Sarah Palin på Dickipedia</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:11:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221469828_sarah_palin_p_dickipe.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221469828_sarah_palin_p_dickipe.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Om Sarah Palin på humorwikien  dickipedia.org :   &quot;The only thing Sarah Palin seems to enjoy more than having children is giving those children ridiculous names and inadequate sex education.&quot; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Om Sarah Palin på humorwikien <a href="http://www.dickipedia.org/dick.php?title=Sarah_Palin">dickipedia.org</a>:<br /><br /><em>&quot;The only thing Sarah Palin seems to enjoy more than having children is giving those children ridiculous names and inadequate sex education.&quot;</em>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>0</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Bush doctrine</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:46:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221467855_bush_doctrine.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221467855_bush_doctrine.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin skuffet Demokratene (og norske politiske kommentatorer) da hun besto den første prøven som visepresidentkandidat under et kritisk intervju med Charlie Gibson og ABC News. Men flere har mobbet henne for å avklare hva Gibson mente da  han spurte om hun støttet Bush-doktrinen :    Gibson: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?       Palin: In what respect, Charlie?       Gibson: The Bush -- well, what do you -- what do you interpret it to be?       Palin: His worldview.       Gibson: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war.       Palin: I believe that what  President Bush  has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hellbent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders along the way, though. There have been mistakes made. And with new leadership, and that&#39;s the beauty of American elections, of course, and democracy, is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better.      Gibson: The Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right to a preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that?      Palin: I agree that a president&#39;s job, when they swear in their oath to uphold our Constitution, their top priority is to defend the United States of America.    I  Wahington Post skriver Charles Krauthammer  at det ikke var Palin, men Gibson, som ikke var informert. Det var Krauthammer som myntet begrepet &quot;the Bush doctrine&quot; og Gibson tar feil når han påstår at dette kun omhandler forebyggende angrep:    &quot;I know something about the subject because, as the  Wikipedia  entry on the Bush doctrine notes, I was the first to use the term. In the cover essay of the June 4, 2001, issue of the  Weekly Standard  entitled, &quot;The Bush Doctrine: ABM, Kyoto, and the New American Unilateralism,&quot; I suggested that the Bush administration policies of unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol, together with others, amounted to a radical change in foreign policy that should be called the Bush doctrine. &quot;   Takk til Lars E. for tips via vampus[a]gmail.com. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin skuffet Demokratene (og norske politiske kommentatorer) da hun besto den første prøven som visepresidentkandidat under et kritisk intervju med Charlie Gibson og ABC News. Men flere har mobbet henne for å avklare hva Gibson mente da <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091203310.html">han spurte om hun støttet Bush-doktrinen</a>:<br /><p> <em>Gibson: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine? </em></p> <p><em> Palin: In what respect, Charlie? </em></p> <p><em> Gibson: The Bush -- well, what do you -- what do you interpret it to be? <br /></em></p><p><em> Palin: His worldview. </em></p> <p><em> Gibson: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war. </em></p> <p><em> Palin: I believe that what <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/George+W.+Bush?tid=informline">President Bush</a> has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hellbent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders along the way, though. There have been mistakes made. And with new leadership, and that&#39;s the beauty of American elections, of course, and democracy, is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better. </em></p> <p><em>Gibson: The Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right to a preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that? </em></p> <p><em>Palin: I agree that a president&#39;s job, when they swear in their oath to uphold our Constitution, their top priority is to defend the United States of America. </em></p><strong>I <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091202457.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">Wahington Post skriver Charles Krauthammer</a> at det ikke var Palin, men Gibson, som ikke var informert. Det var Krauthammer som myntet begrepet &quot;the Bush doctrine&quot; og Gibson tar feil når han påstår at dette kun omhandler forebyggende angrep: </strong><br /><br />&quot;I know something about the subject because, as the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Wikimedia+Foundation+Inc.?tid=informline">Wikipedia</a> entry on the Bush doctrine notes, I was the first to use the term. In the cover essay of the June 4, 2001, issue of the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/The+Weekly+Standard+Magazine?tid=informline">Weekly Standard</a> entitled, &quot;The Bush Doctrine: ABM, Kyoto, and the New American Unilateralism,&quot; I suggested that the Bush administration policies of unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol, together with others, amounted to a radical change in foreign policy that should be called the Bush doctrine. &quot;<br /><br /><strong>Takk til Lars E. for tips via vampus[a]gmail.com.</strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>1</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Obama vs. Palin</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221467445_obama_vs_palin.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221467445_obama_vs_palin.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[ &quot;A debate between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Palin over executive experience also isn&#39;t smart politics for Democrats. As Mr. Obama talks down Mrs. Palin&#39;s record, voters may start comparing backgrounds. He won&#39;t come off well.&quot;   Obama kan ikke vinne mot Palin, skriver Karl Rove i  Wall Street Journal. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>&quot;A debate between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Palin over executive experience also isn&#39;t smart politics for Democrats. As Mr. Obama talks down Mrs. Palin&#39;s record, voters may start comparing backgrounds. He won&#39;t come off well.&quot;<br /><br /></em>Obama kan ikke vinne mot Palin, skriver Karl Rove i <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html">Wall Street Journal.</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>0</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Forget that she is a woman</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221153838_fforget_that_she_is_a.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221153838_fforget_that_she_is_a.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Joe Biden får  noen gode råd  om hvordan han ikke skal tape debattene mot Sarah Palin:   There is no easy way to tell you this, Joe Biden, but the surest way for Joe Biden to lose a debate against Sarah Palin is by being Joe Biden. If you are windy, pompous, unctuous, or pushy, you will come across as patronizing and condescending?the guy who puts the &quot;boy&quot; into &quot;old boys&#39; network.&quot; If you flirt and smirk and flatter (Did you  truly  tell an Ohio crowd you thought Palin was &quot;good-looking&quot;? Did you  really  introduce us to your wife, Jill, by leering that she is &quot;drop-dead gorgeous&quot;?), you&#39;re going to sound like the creepy guy in the trench coat at the back of the porn theater.   Må man ha en annen debattstrategi mot kvinner enn mot menn?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Joe Biden får <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199363/">noen gode råd</a> om hvordan han ikke skal tape debattene mot Sarah Palin:<br /><br /><em>There is no easy way to tell you this, Joe Biden, but the surest way for Joe Biden to lose a debate against Sarah Palin is by being Joe Biden. If you are windy, pompous, unctuous, or pushy, you will come across as patronizing and condescending?the guy who puts the &quot;boy&quot; into &quot;old boys&#39; network.&quot; If you flirt and smirk and flatter (Did you <em>truly</em> tell an Ohio crowd you thought Palin was &quot;good-looking&quot;? Did you <em>really</em> introduce us to your wife, Jill, by leering that she is &quot;drop-dead gorgeous&quot;?), you&#39;re going to sound like the creepy guy in the trench coat at the back of the porn theater.</em><br /><br />Må man ha en annen debattstrategi mot kvinner enn mot menn?]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>12</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Matt Damon om Palin</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221074929_matt_damon_om_palin.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221074929_matt_damon_om_palin.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hollywoods skarpeste analytiker,  Matt Damon , tror at valget av Sarah Palin som visepresidentkandidat var basert på politiske årsaker.  Det må jo være i motsetning til Demokratenes valg av Joe Biden.  *hjem og se på Team America en gang til*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hollywoods skarpeste analytiker, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/10/matt-damon-on-palin-like_n_125334.html">Matt Damon</a>, tror at valget av Sarah Palin som visepresidentkandidat var basert på politiske årsaker.<br /><br />Det må jo være i motsetning til Demokratenes valg av Joe Biden.<br /><br />*hjem og se på Team America en gang til*]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>4</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Ti ting du trenger å vite om Palin</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221074286_ti_ting_du_trenger__v.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221074286_ti_ting_du_trenger__v.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[5. A month before her fifth child, Trig, was due, Mrs Palin&#39;s waters broke while she was in Texas to address a conference. She delivered her speech nonetheless and embarked on the long flight back to Alaska - changing planes in Seattle - before travelling an hour by road to hospital to give birth. She says she was not in &quot;active labour&quot; and her doctor said it was fine. Alaska Airlines allows women to travel in the late stages of pregnancy. (...) Three days later, Mrs Palin was back at work.   Les BBCs 10 ting du bør vite  om Sarah Palin . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[5. A month before her fifth child, Trig, was due, Mrs Palin&#39;s waters broke while she was in Texas to address a conference. She delivered her speech nonetheless and embarked on the long flight back to Alaska - changing planes in Seattle - before travelling an hour by road to hospital to give birth. She says she was not in &quot;active labour&quot; and her doctor said it was fine. Alaska Airlines allows women to travel in the late stages of pregnancy. (...) Three days later, Mrs Palin was back at work.<br /><br /><em>Les BBCs 10 ting du bør vite <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7607039.stm">om Sarah Palin</a>.</em>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>0</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Feminism&#039;s greatest leap forward since Madonna</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221054326_feminisms_greatest_le.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1221054326_feminisms_greatest_le.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[&quot;Over the Labor Day weekend, with most of the big enchiladas of the major media on vacation, the vacuum was filled with a hallucinatory hurricane in the leftist blogosphere, which unleashed a grotesquely lurid series of allegations, fantasies, half-truths and outright lies about Palin. What a tacky low in American politics -- which has already caused a backlash that could damage Obama&#39;s campaign. When liberals come off as childish, raving loonies, the right wing gains. I am still waiting for substantive evidence that Sarah Palin is a dangerous extremist. I am perfectly willing to be convinced, but right now, she seems to be merely an optimistic pragmatist like Ronald Reagan, someone who pays lip service to religious piety without being in the least wedded to it. I don&#39;t see her arrival as portending the end of civil liberties or life as we know it.&quot;  Fra Camille Paglias spalte i Salon -  Fresh blood for the Vampire  - inspirerende lesning!   Takk til Lars E. for tips.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Over the Labor Day weekend, with most of the big enchiladas of the major media on vacation, the vacuum was filled with a hallucinatory hurricane in the leftist blogosphere, which unleashed a grotesquely lurid series of allegations, fantasies, half-truths and outright lies about Palin. What a tacky low in American politics -- which has already caused a backlash that could damage Obama&#39;s campaign. When liberals come off as childish, raving loonies, the right wing gains. I am still waiting for substantive evidence that Sarah Palin is a dangerous extremist. I am perfectly willing to be convinced, but right now, she seems to be merely an optimistic pragmatist like Ronald Reagan, someone who pays lip service to religious piety without being in the least wedded to it. I don&#39;t see her arrival as portending the end of civil liberties or life as we know it.&quot;<br /><br />Fra Camille Paglias spalte i Salon - <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2008/09/10/palin/index.html">Fresh blood for the Vampire</a> - inspirerende lesning! <br /><br />Takk til Lars E. for tips.]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>2</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>VP from Dusk till Dawn</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:43:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1220949780_vp_from_dusk_till_daw.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1220949780_vp_from_dusk_till_daw.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Sarah ser til og med bra ut som en Tarantino-karakter fra Dusk till Dawn. Ser for meg mange konstruktive møter med saudiaraberne i fremtiden... via  Tim Blair.    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah ser til og med bra ut som en Tarantino-karakter fra Dusk till Dawn. Ser for meg mange konstruktive møter med saudiaraberne i fremtiden... via <a href="http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/timblair/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/guns_and_meat/">Tim Blair.</a><br /><br /><img class="image" src="http://i.blogg.no/400x517/http://palinpower.blogg.no/images/palin_1220949825.jpg" alt="palin" width="400" height="517" />]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>0</bs:comments>
						<bs:image>http://i.blogg.no/400x517/http://palinpower.blogg.no/images/palin_1220949825.jpg</bs:image>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Pusedyr for Palin</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:51:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1220892324_pusedyr_for_palin.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1220892324_pusedyr_for_palin.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Selv Pusedyr viser seg å støtte Palin og sitter for tiden og kvesser kredittkortet mitt for bruk  på denne siden . Tipper han snart har noen nye matskåler og diverse stæsj på vei i postkassa. Så lenge det er en button til mor også så er det greit.   VamPus  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Selv Pusedyr viser seg å støtte Palin og sitter for tiden og kvesser kredittkortet mitt for bruk <a href="http://shop.cafepress.com/design/29889618" target="_blank">på denne siden</a>. Tipper han snart har noen nye matskåler og diverse stæsj på vei i postkassa. Så lenge det er en button til mor også så er det greit. <p><a href="http://vampus.blogspot.com/">VamPus</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>5</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
		<item>
			<title>Velkommen til min blogg!</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1220891336_velkommen_til_min_blo.html</link>
			<guid>http://palinpower.blogg.no/1220891336_velkommen_til_min_blo.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[ Dette er den første posten på min nye blogg ;) ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dette er den første posten på min nye blogg ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<bs:blogid></bs:blogid>
			<bs:blogurl></bs:blogurl>
			<bs:blogname></bs:blogname>
			<bs:itemtitle></bs:itemtitle>
			<bs:image-profile></bs:image-profile>
			<bs:url-profile></bs:url-profile>
			<bs:comments>0</bs:comments>
					
		</item>

		
	</channel>
</rss>

